Monday, October 20, 2008

License portability

Ah, to be a medical doctor. To only have to pass the boards once, and then be done with it. Forever. Marriage and family therapists -- who, at least in theory, practice the same art no matter where they roam -- are subject to a mishmash of licensure laws around the 50 states, with various requirements for education, experience, and examinations. Taking your MFT license to a new state can be a nightmare, as you may be forced to provide transcripts and syllabi from classes taken decades ago, register as an intern no matter how long you've been licensed, and in some states, go through another testing process. If you are considering ever moving to another state -- and even if you're not considering it now, most people eventually do -- here are five things you can do to make license portability easier.
  1. Graduate from a COAMFTE-Accredited program. The education requirements of most states specify that in order to be licensed as an MFT, you must have gone to a COAMFTE-accredited program or a reasonable equivalent. Spare yourself the trouble of having to prove equivalency, which can be a tedious process.
  2. Do your prelicensed hours under an AAMFT Approved Supervisor. In states that specifically require an AAMFT Approved Supervisor in order for licensure hours to count (North Carolina is one example among many), all supervisors go through the training. In states that do not require this, far fewer do. This presents some obvious problems if you move from a state that didn't require AAMFT-Approved supervision to one that does.
  3. Get an early start with the state to which you're moving. Establishing educational equivalency and suitable experience for licensure in a new state can be very time-consuming. Most states have their requirements online, but you should contact the state licensing board directly to figure out exactly what paperwork you will need to file -- and who, in your current state, will need to sign off on it.
  4. Don't stop at 3,000 hours of prelicensed experience. While this is the numerical requirement in many states, a number of states require more. Gathering 3,200 hours will make you a bit safer. Ideally, if you know what state you will be moving to early enough, you can craft your prelicensure experience to meet that state's standards.
  5. Document well. Any time there is a disagreement about whether you have met a certain requirement in your new state, you will need documentation to back up your side. Keep careful documentation of your supervision, your education, and what types of hours you're doing (individual client contact, family client contact, supervision, etc.), as some states require hours to be specifically categorized. Naturally, not all states agree about what those categories should be. You may have exactly the education and experience your new state wants, but if you can't prove it, you will not get licensed there.

It's tempting to add a sixth rule here -- "Don't involve California" -- since some of the greatest difficulty in license portability in the country is experienced by those coming into or out of the Golden State. But we need more MFTs here, so if you're thinking about it, do come to California. Just prepare yourself, as California is the only state in the country that licenses MFTs without using the National MFT Exam. And our other California MFT license requirements can get a little goofy too.

5 comments:

Nestor said...

And don't forget some states require more than CA 150hrs of practicum hours. So, since CA allows up to 700hrs in practicum it will be smarter not to stop at 150hrs.

Juvenile Drum said...

Hi! I want to do graduate study at Loma Linda University in Cali, to gain a spiritual basis for my MFT practice later on, but I'm pretty sure I won't be living in CA; I might move to VA afterward. Do you have any advice for me? Is what I want to do going to make it much more difficult to gain intern opportunities and licensing in VA?

MC said...

I'm finishing my MS MFT equivalent degree in Oklahoma, considering moving to CA--the licensing requirements are different and confusing, for sure. I'm just not even sure where to start in examining if it's worth it. Your blog is very helpful. Biggest difference I've noticed is that OK only requires one semester practicum! UG! I'm not sure if I can gain practicum hours in CA post graduation, although I see info that I can obtain other lacking course work post grad. Wonder when they will ever get around to national licensing, lol. Thanks, again--very informative.

Anonymous said...

Ben,

thanks for the service of your editorials. They are both informative and thought provoking. But also be aware that they come off as very biased toward all things AAMFT. It was the AAMFT who made an illegal closed door meeting with the California BBS that sparked the CAMFT lawsuit over the LPCC licensing exam. The BBS put themselves above the law by choosing not to abide by the courts rulings. For an organization of such highly touted standards; AAMFT the blog reported standard barer for the proper way of doing things throughout county, your organizations ethics and those of the bureaucrats at BBS could use a little improvement. In the future you might want to be a little more reflective on the internal workings of AAMFT before casting stones when writing about MFTs in California vs other states.

Ben Caldwell said...

@Anonymous - Where to begin with this? Okay: 1. There is nothing at all illegal about AAMFT or any group meeting with representatives from the BBS. This happens all the time, and should happen all the time. CAMFT does it, NASW does it, other organizations do it. It is part of the BBS's mandate to actively work with stakeholders. 2. The BBS fully abided by the ruling of the court in the CAMFT lawsuit over the gap exam -- a lawsuit that CAMFT largely lost, regardless of what spin they have put on it. Following the ruling, the BBS consulted with OPES as instructed by the court. OPES, an independent body within state government, recommended a gap exam (last pages of PDF). The BBS followed their recommendation. 3. The rest of your comment I can't quite follow, so I don't know how to respond to it. But I don't place any higher or lower value on MFTs in California as opposed to anywhere else; I just want to raise awareness for MFTs moving into or out of California that there are differences.