This blog has moved

All of the posts from the Psychotherapy Notes blog are now available at our new home:

Please update your links and bookmarks accordingly.

Some of the most popular posts on the blog are being kept here on the legacy site through the end of 2014, but will be deleted from here soon after. (Everything can be found at the new site.) Please come join the blog at its new home to see more updated posts and to leave comments on any post. Thanks for your continued support!

Monday, September 12, 2011

Four myths about MFT licensing exams

Go ahead and be anxious about your licensing exam process -- it's a big deal! But don't buy into grumbling falsehoods about it. Test items are written by actual MFTs, and there are no trick questions.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Every person who becomes a licensed marriage and family therapist has to go through an examination process. In most states, that means passing the National MFT Exam. Many states also supplement the national exam with a second exam covering areas of state law (for example, ensuring that therapists are familiar with that state's requirements for child abuse reporting). In California, the exam process is a bit different; California MFTs must pass two state-run exams, the MFT Standard Written Exam and the MFT Written Clinical Vignette Exam. The overall content and structure of California's exams are similar to the National MFT Exam -- they're multiple-choice tests that use a combination of factual questions and case-vignette-based questions.

Regardless of what state you're in, if you haven't taken the exam(s) yet, you may be dreading them. Even if you have gone through the exam process, you may not have fond memories of it. I hear complaints about the licensing exam process on a regular basis -- most of them based on total mythology. It's as if we (quite understandably) have anxiety-based associations with our testing process, past or future, and then (far less understandably) conjure up rational-sounding but totally baseless complaints about the process in an attempt to justify those fears.

To read the rest of this post, please follow this link to the blog's new home at (The link takes you straight to this full post on the new site, and all comments are there too.)